René Collier - An Overview

A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.

René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, significantly within a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.

Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which is partially constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized team has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.

The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable initiatives by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o for the duration of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.

The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered intimately with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second while in the legal timeline.

On the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, continues to be called meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and conditions connected to the permission.

Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting rather that it is about ensuring that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.

On one other Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Particular Area of Conservation and say that each one functions are actually completed depending on Skilled advice and accredited plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea during a storm, tend not to change the fundamental info.

The case has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for just a predicament that many observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.

The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier famous the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from incredibly distinctive Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand circumstance.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical reality of the coastline and the symbolic character from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much strategy.

As the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to ascertain if the wall as built complies with planning permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and planning problems. However the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other prolonged once the lawful fees have been paid.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design works at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case lengthen further than that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns which include environmental security and property rights are perceived to be at stake.

In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. No matter whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed planning disputes in north Dublin lately.